Comments on: The aesthetics (or lack thereof) of gender-inclusive language http://banannery.com/2009/07/02/the-aesthetics-or-lack-thereof-of-gender-inclusive-language/ Part of this complete breakfast. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:36:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: LaLa http://banannery.com/2009/07/02/the-aesthetics-or-lack-thereof-of-gender-inclusive-language/#comment-1780 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:37:55 +0000 http://banannery.com/?p=616#comment-1780 Well…the national anthem has been changed in the past already and there are a lot of Canadians that are already confused over the lyrics……so no one will notice when u are mumbling out that line….everyone else will be too….

]]> By: Larry http://banannery.com/2009/07/02/the-aesthetics-or-lack-thereof-of-gender-inclusive-language/#comment-1779 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:38:56 +0000 http://banannery.com/?p=616#comment-1779 You think that’s bad, you should look at this couple. They are raising their child, “Pop” without referring to their child as a boy or girl, but simply “Pop” to “cast off” any “social construct” of gender.

http://www.thelocal.se/20232/20090623/

]]> By: Tim http://banannery.com/2009/07/02/the-aesthetics-or-lack-thereof-of-gender-inclusive-language/#comment-1778 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:54:42 +0000 http://banannery.com/?p=616#comment-1778 hey I see what you did there at the end, man

]]>